January-February 2003
Being lazy and tired, I decided to hang out a few more minutes in bed. The t.v. is at the foot of the bed. What better way to sleep while awake than to turn on the tube? It was a film. After all, that is the reason I switched to satellite. Thousands of films-movies galore-and no commercials. Unfortunately, most of the films are grade B or C or even D and are played again and again and again. This one was a film based on a Dean Koontz novel called "Servant of " something. With satellite you have the advantage of getting a summary of a film. This one had a description something like this: Detective ends up protecting young boy against the designs of a cult leader who thinks the boy is the anti-Christ and must be killed. At last, I thought, a film that deals with this "devil" theme in a new way. At last we will be treated to a film that portrays some of the craziness of this whole "possession" phenomenon. For about thirty years moviegoers have been treated to some form of devil film after another. The grandaddy of all such recent films was the Exorcist which, after twenty-six years, has been re-released. The story of the Exorcist is a prototype. An innocent twelve year old girl is possessed by the Devil. (Ever wonder why the Devil never goes after grizzled old farts, like me? It's always someone innocent and pure.) This beautiful, innocent child (played by Linda Blair who later had to combat her own real hard drug demons) becomes the voice of evil. Only a priest can save her. Not a rabbi, not a minister, not even a good intentioned agnostic and certainly not an atheist. Only a priest can save her. And a priest does save her. The forces of good triumph, the possessed child stops pissing on the floor, stops barfing across the room, stops speaking like Mercedes McCambridge and stops swirling her head around on its axis. The priest dies of course. But good in the form of an organized Church, triumphs. This has become a film habit. After the Exorcist came three other Exorcist movies and various Omen movies. Again the Devil takes hold of an innocent who only can be saved by the Church. Funny thing about all these movies is their common theme: Good in the form of a priest triumphs over the devil and evil in the form of a possessed innocent. Of course, the films utilize ever more sophisticated technology to generate an array of gurgles, horrific glowing eyes, horrific demons, slimy snakes with human faces, slimy humans with snake like faces. Actually, the visualization of evil hasn't really progressed very far since the Middle Ages. Most of these nightmarish demons look like they had been lifted from the battlements of Notre Dame Cathedral. And Bruegel was far more imaginative in picturing the horrors of hell. It is all very medieval, this Manichean struggle between good and evil, this war between the servants of the Devil and the servants of the Church. It is very medieval.
This exorcising of evil was all very scholarly. In 1484, Pope Innocent VIII (yet another Innocent) apparently was sexually fearful. Pope Innocent had become known for giving his illegitimate children sumptuous Vatican weddings. However, he had come to fear the influence of witches. Perhaps it was just aging. Viagra wasn't around. And, a common accusation against witches was that they stole the penises of men and kept them in boxes, rendering the unfortunate male impotent. In any event, Innocent appointed two German Dominicans, Jacov Sprenger and Heinrich Kramer as Inquisitors into witchcraft. The good Pope said that this was necessary because there were reports that in the dioceses of Cologne, Mainz, Trier and Salzburg, many women were engaging in sorcery "to make the conjugal act impossible". Sex, witchcraft and exorcism-sounds like a classic Hollywood formula. In any event, these witch hunters produced a book, Malleus Malificorum or Hammer of Evil. There was a sexual hysteria inherent in these early exorcists. For them, any woman could be accused of causing impotence and therefore a witch. Sexuality, itself, was considered to be evil and women its main force. In accordance with Church doctrines, unbaptised babies were instruments of the Devil. Therefore, midwives became a prime target for the witch hunters as these were the women who first had contact with the infant. And, finally, these astute Dominicans, developed a variety of methods by which The evil spirit could be exorcised. Now, as we enter the third millennium, the spirit of Torquemada lives. What in heaven's name is it all about? How can the darkest superstitions of the Dark Ages find success at our cinematic box offices? First is fear.Without fear there is no superstition. In fact, without fear there is no hate. Second, there is a kind of righteousness. This is a temporary feeling of security that comes when we see evil outside of ourselves. [Over time I have found that the more righteous I feel, the more fearful and full of it, I am]. What incredible things we humans can do when we place evil outside of ourselves. And Christianity has no monopoly on righteousness-no exclusive claim to the definition of evil. In the fifteen years following World War I, most Germans lived in fear and powerlessness. The Allied Powers had broken the back of the German economy. A depression swept across Europe. And a little housepainter rallied a nation in fear-a people feeling powerless-to destroy the external evils:
Jews, Communists, Gypsies. The Nazis simply had to see these as evil to destroy millions, efficiently. Wilhelm Reich, a pioneer, with Freud and Jung, of modern psychiatry once wrote a book on the Mass Psychology of Fascism. He knew it well as he fled his homeland while the Nazi's stamped out all opposition.For Reich, the real evil of Nazism as that it externalized evil. For the Nazis, evil was elsewhere-the Jews, the Communists, the gypsies.
As long as we see evil outside of ourselves, we lose our humanity. As long as we project our own fears and darkness externally we become righteous robots. And robots can be manipulated. People in power have used the fear and threat of evil for ages. Us. And Them. Us and Them. Us and Them. A barbaric concept dating from the dawn of civilization. Who knows? Maybe once upon a time in our ancient history the tribe was "Us". Everyone else was "Them". Maybe once upon a time when food was scarce, the very survival of the tribe meant demonizing all others. All others were a threat. All others were enemies. All others were "Them". Us against Them. The more fear, the easier to manipulate.
The solution was as simple as it was for the inquisitors: you just eliminated the evils. Exterminate them. This was the ultimate exorcism.
"What
luck for rulers that men do not think." | |||||||
|